Friday, June 10, 2011

10/06 Rebuilding trust a year after Kyrgyzstan ethnic unrest



Family in OshDeadly clashes in southern Kyrgyzstan last year scarred communities
One year after hundreds of people were killed in ethnic violence in southern Kyrgyzstan, Uzbeks and Kyrgyz continue trying to rebuild lives and trust between divided communities.
People are still clearing rubble and rebuilding homes in Cheremushki, a neighbourhood in Kyrgyzstan's second largest city of Osh.
In the seasonal heat of the day, the workers wear face masks to keep the building dust at bay.
Cheremushki, a mainly Uzbek neighbourhood - or malhalla as it is locally known - saw some of the worst violence during four days of killing, burning and looting last year.
In one day alone, nearly three quarters of houses were destroyed.
For many, emotions are still raw. Khalida Khalmatova, an ethnic Uzbek, lost her brother. She still struggles to understand how ordinary lives could be turned upside down in this way.
"My brother was an ordinary man. I don't have a husband and I was raising my two children on my own. My brother was our main bread-winner. Now his family and us - 11 people lost our bread winner," she says.
'Emotions withheld'
She says that the family has Kyrgyz friends, and that there is no hostility now.
Sharipa Abdukharimova with daughter and grand children, OshSharipa Abdukharimova said her house was burned down during the clashes
"They tell us that they are not to blame, we tell them that we are not to blame either, they've got their losses, we have endured losses," she says.
It is a theme repeated in conversations with Kyrgyz residents too.
In a village on the outskirts of Osh, Sharipa Abdukharimova recalls how a group of Uzbek men armed with rifles approached their neighbourhood.
As Kyrgyz men went to confront them, she and other women and children fled. Her house was burned down, with all their possessions inside.
She says that now most male family members have gone to Russia in search of work, so they can rebuild their lives. Local work is hard to come by.

Start Quote

After the June violence, in the city of Osh and the region, society is divided by ethnicity”
Izatulla RahmatullaevHuman rights activist
Ms Abdukharimova, too, says that she seeks contact with her Uzbek neighbours, but that things have changed.
"I am a woman and I go to my Uzbek neighbours' houses and ask the wives how they live, if everything is fine with them. We talk to each other but it is not the same as it used to be before," she says.
The language is restrained, but there is a sense of emotions withheld, that good neighbourliness has been badly damaged.
Crime against humanity?
Many Kyrgyz blame what they see as Uzbek separatism for fanning the flames last year. Many Uzbeks have pointed to Kyrgyz nationalism as a driving force.
And with ethnic Uzbeks accounting for most of the arrests, charges and convictions made so far, there is a sense of bias in the justice system too.
Cheremushki itself is at the very heart of the debate about the nature of the violence.
An inquiry by international investigators says that a crowd of Kyrgyz - several thousand strong - broke through barriers erected by Uzbek residents, using an armoured personnel carrier.
It says that Uzbek residents were subsequently shot or beaten, some women were raped, houses burned and belongings stolen.
Houses burning in Jalalabad, Kyrgyzstan - 13 June 2010A probe into the violence found serious violations of international law
The independent Kyrgyzstan Inquiry Commission says that, while violence was perpetrated by both sides, what happened in Cheremushki might amount to a crime against humanity if proven in a court of law.
The Kyrgyz government has angrily rebutted such suggestions, calling the report biased.
Back in Cheremushki, headmistress Svetlana Karpushkina is dealing with the day-to-day fallout from the crisis.
"We had a few incidents in our school when Kyrgyz kids called Uzbeks derogatory names, so I called their parents and I explained what happened and I told them that it is probably the influence of the family," she says.
Couple subsidies
Izatulla Rahmatullaev, a local human rights activist who works with victims of sexual violence in Osh, says that Uzbeks and Kyrgyz are living more separate lives.
"After the June violence, in the city of Osh and the region, society is divided by ethnicity, Kyrgyz live by themselves, and Uzbeks live by themselves," he says.
The authorities have been trying to address this with a number of initiatives to help rebuilt trust.
They are even giving subsidies to mixed couples who have decided to marry.
Compensation payments have been coming through too, for lives lost, injuries sustained and property lost.
But despite the public proclamations, it is lost trust that is harder to restore.
Tolkunbek Turdubaev and Aibek Abdyldaev in Osh contributed to this report

10/06 What's it like to be a sponsored child?



Children who receive sponsorship from the charity Compassion
Sponsoring a child in the developing world is a popular form of charitable giving. But what do the children themselves make of the system?

Start Quote

I wrote and thanked them for taking care of me up to this day”
Priscilla
When Priscilla was a child, a donor many thousands of miles from her Ghanaian village helped pay for her schooling.
For years she exchanged letters with her British benefactor. Now she is 20, the charity has stopped the sponsorship and the relationship.
"Last year I wrote to them saying goodbye and thanked them for taking care of me up to this day," says Priscilla, an accountancy student. "When I was writing, I was full of tears. Tears were coming from my eyes."
She's deeply grateful to her sponsor. But this combines with sadness at the end of their contact.
Sponsor-a-child arrangements throw up emotional highs and lows for the children, something many donors are unaware of.
Priscilla's sponsorship was arranged through World Vision. The charity has boosted the fortunes of Dangme West, which used to be one of the most deprived areas in greater Accra, the capital of Ghana.
World Vision One Life exhibitionCharities like World Vision and Plan International use sponsor-a-child models to raise funds
Youngsters such as Priscilla are sponsored for up to 15 years. They often receive letters and gifts, so many feel a close bond with their sponsor.
Augustina, 14, who hopes to become a doctor, says her sponsor has sent her many things - shoes, bags, crayons, books. She hopes her sponsor loves her, and wants to visit her in England.
Some even want their sponsors' e-mail addresses, so they can carry on their correspondence into adulthood. But charities do not encourage this, for fear of dependency.
It's an arrangement that can bring disappointment, as well as money. Abraham tells me he hasn't heard from his sponsor for eight years, and he doesn't know why.

Start Quote

Unmet expectations and disappointment for children poses a serious ethical concern”
Sussex University report on sponsor-a-child schemes
More than eight million children around the world are sponsored by Western benefactors. This takes the form of regular donations to a charity, which links the sponsor with a deprived child. The charity also oversees the exchange of letters, and also provides updates on the child's progress.
It is a form of aid that's popular with donors, being high on the feel-good factor, and lucrative for charities as a source of long-term funding. About $3bn (£1.8bn) is channelled towards the poorest children in this way every year.
There are two approaches to child sponsorship. The oldest is still used by the evangelical Christian organisation, Compassion.
In the run-down industrial area of Kpone-on-Sea near Accra, sponsors' regular donations help more than 200 children with free schooling, healthcare and extra Saturday classes in life skills such as basic sanitation and computers.
Sponsors are encouraged to write, and often have a very personal link with their child, even to the degree of being their spiritual mentor.

Start Quote

I am surprised that somebody I don't even know loves me this way”
Jennifer, age 12
"I think of them as close relatives," says Mary, 12. She thinks it's great that someone in another country has seen her picture and chosen to be her friend.
When she feels lonely, she looks through the letters and pictures from the family that sponsors her.
Compassion is proud of its Christian ethos. The sponsored children are chosen by local churches, but the charity says families of any faith can benefit.
We visit a Muslim family living in a dark, cramped, one-room house. They hope sponsorship will help their 11-year old son eventually get a good job so they can escape poverty.
Does he mind that this means he is getting a Christian education?
"I feel that Allah and God are the same, and the Bible and the Koran, too, are the same," he says. His mother agrees.
But is it fair?
Some donors make financial gifts in addition to their sponsorship payments.
A new home for Jennifer's family, thanks to generous cheques from her US donor Jennifer, in pink, and her family outside their new home
Another family we visit has recently moved to a new settlement thanks to generous extra cheques from a donor in the US.
Twelve-year-old Jennifer shows off her new concrete house. "I am surprised that somebody so far away that I don't even know loves me this way," she says.
While Compassion's sponsored children have effectively won the lottery, some aid experts argue that this approach is unfair and divisive.
So many big charities now allocate sponsors' money to community development projects instead of focusing it on individual children.
This is the kind of scheme World Vision operates for Priscilla and others in Dangme West.
Plan International also uses the community development approach. A few years ago they commissioned a study from Sussex University into the impact of their operations.
Its 2008 report found there was "anxiety, jealousy and disappointment among those children and families who receive no letters or gifts".
And, notwithstanding the success stories, "the much larger scale of unmet expectations and emotional disappointment for children poses a serious ethical concern and challenge".
ClassroomA classroom in Odumase
Plan has since tried to manage children's expectations. It is abolishing gifts, and no longer requires children to write unless the sponsor writes to them.
When Plan arrived in the village of Odumase, west of Accra, 17 years ago, there was no school building, no clean drinking water nor sanitation. The village has benefited hugely from sponsorship funds. And aside from letters, there is no difference between what sponsored and unsponsored children receive.
We watch as a big brown envelope is delivered to one of the sponsored children, 13-year-old Ebenezer. It is the third piece of correspondence he has received in seven years, and contains a postcard and a few words of greeting.
Ebenezer appears crestfallen. Although happy to get the postcard, Ebenezer feels the lack of gifts means his sponsor doesn't care about him, and that makes him sad.
But Eric and Naomi, the teenage helpers, enthusiastically begin to help him draft a reply. He wants to ask for a football and a skipping rope, but that, he is told, is not allowed.
This raises the question - without the direct financial link and the gifts, and if donors aren't frequent writers, what is left of the sponsorship relationship? And should it be abandoned altogether?
Naomi, Eric and EbenezerNaomi and Eric help Ebenezer write to his sponsor
Plan UK's chief executive, Marie Staunton, argues that sponsorship is still an intrinsic part of the development process, helping with education and the necessary reporting back to head office on how children are faring. It also gives leadership experience to the teenagers who help with the process.
"I don't think the sponsorship we do is diluted at all. What sponsors want is long-term changes in children's lives. Because of sponsorship, we are focused on children, children have a say. People like Eric and Naomi have had years of communicating to people outside their village."
The charities argue it's a way to raise money that would not otherwise be there for development. Ultimately, though, it will be for donors to decide the future of child sponsorship.
A Child to Sponsor is broadcast on BBC Radio 4 at 1100 BST on Friday, 10 June 2011.

09/06 Man 'denied French citizenship over degrading views'


A Tunisian-born immigrant in France shows his passport during a protest, 28 April 2011It may be getting harder for immigrants to become French
An Algerian man living in France has been denied French citizenship because of his "degrading" attitude towards women, media report.
An inquiry showed the man did not respect the principle of equality between the sexes, Europe 1 radio quotes a French official as saying.
It adds the unprecedented decision signals tough new requirement for obtaining nationality.
The unnamed man is said to have been married to a French citizen for years.
An interior ministry official quoted by Europe 1 insisted the rejection was justified.
The man's behaviour, the official said, had been "incompatible with the basic values of the French community and the principle of equality between men and women".

09/06 Nhiều nữ chính trị gia cũng dính bê bối tình ái!


09/06/2011 | 11:37:00

Bà Iris Robinson, nghị sĩ và đệ nhất phu nhân của Ireland (Nguồn: Getty)
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mark Sanford, Silvio Berlusconi, John Edwards... Danh sách những chính trị gia nam rắc rối vì thói trăng hoa còn rất dài, nhưng có một điều ít ai để ý là nữ giới trên chính trường cũng tỏ ra là những người đào hoa không kém. Dưới đây là danh sách tổng hợp của báo Mỹ The New Yorker.

Helen Chenoweth, nghị sĩ đảng Cộng hòa bang Idaho, Mỹ. 


Sau khi lên tiếng chỉ trích đối thủ đảng Dân chủ của bà bằng cách xếp chung ông này với Bill Clinton, người mà vụ bê bối nổi tiếng với Monica Lewinsky đã “hủy hoại năng lực của ông ấy trong việc lãnh đạo đất nước chúng ta và thế giới tự do”, bà Chenoweth thừa nhận đã đi lại vụng trộm trong suốt sáu năm trời với một người đàn ông đã có vợ làm việc dưới quyền trong văn phòng nghị sĩ của bà.

Lời bào chữa: “Tôi đã hỏi Chúa xin được tha thứ, và tôi đã được tha thứ”.

Iris Robinson, nghị sĩ và đệ nhất phu nhân của Ireland.

Quan hệ ngoài hôn nhân với một người nhỏ hơn bà 40 tuổi, nàng 60 và chàng 20.

Lời bào chữa: Bà giải thích rằng cuộc phiêu lưu tình ái đó là do “quá nhiều căng thẳng” và “sức ép của một cuộc sống bị công chúng vây quanh” khi bà thôi chức ở nghị viện sau khi vụ ngoại tình bị phát giác.

Katherine Bryson, dân biểu bang Utah, Mỹ

Bị bắt gặp đang ân ái với người tình qua một camera theo dõi do chồng bà lắp. Ông Kay Bryson sau đó giải thích ông chỉ định lắp camera để “chống trộm”.

Jacqui Smith, Bộ trưởng an ninh nội địa Anh

Bị cáo buộc mua phim con heo bằng tiền ngân sách quốc hội chuẩn chi cho bà.

Lời bào chữa: Chồng bà là người mua cuốn phim trên, nhưng bà Smith vẫn từ chức và nói bà “là người đã làm điều không đúng”.

Edwina Currie, nghị sĩ Anh


Lăng nhăng với cựu thủ tướng John Major khi họ còn là những thành viên trong nội các của cựu thủ tướng Margerte Thatcher.

Lời bào chữa: Vào lúc bà tiết lộ vụ ngoại tình trong cuốn nhật ký vừa xuất bản, bà đã rời khỏi chính trường. Ông Major, xây dựng chiến dịch tranh cử của mình trên nền tảng các giá trị gia đình, là người lãnh hậu quả.

Chu Mei-feng, ủy viên hội đồng thành phố Đài Bắc, Đài Loan

Quay băng lại cảnh ân ái với người tình và đoạn băng bị phát tán lên mạng.

Lời bào chữa: Không có lợi cho sự nghiệp chính trị, nhưng chắc chắn rất được làng giải trí tán thưởng./.
 
H.Minh (Vietnam+)