Showing posts with label wikipedia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wikipedia. Show all posts

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Femme fatal

http://femme-fatale.jp/


Femme fatale

Page d'aide sur l'homonymie Pour les articles homonymes, voir Femme fatale (homonymie).

Mata Haridanseuse accusée d'espionnage, a rendu son nom synonyme de « femme fatale » pendant la Première Guerre mondiale.
Une femme fatale est un personnage type qui utilise le pouvoir de la sexualité pour piéger le héros malchanceux. La femme fatale est généralement décrite comme une femme sexuellement insatiable.
Elle séduit, sans se « donner », et est souvent caractérisée physiquement comme une femme très féminine et moralement comme une femme séductrice (dans la littérature décadente, puis au cinéma). Dans certaines situations, elle use du mensonge et de la contrainte plus que du charme.
Elle peut aussi être (ou prétendre d'être) une victime, aux prises avec une situation à laquelle elle ne peut échapper ; le personnage de Rita Hayworth dans La Dame de Shanghai, un film noir, en donne un tel exemple. Son arme de prédilection est souvent le poison, qui sert aussi de métaphore pour ses charmes.
Bien que typiquement dans le camp du mal, les femmes fatales ont aussi incarné des antihéroïnes dans certaines histoires, ou se repentent pour devenir des héroïnes à la fin du récit. Dans la vie sociale, la femme fatale torture son amant dans une relation déséquilibrée, en ne formulant jamais la confirmation de ses sentiments. Elle le pousse tellement à bout qu'il devient incapable de prendre des décisions rationnelles.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Sopa and Pipa protests not over, says Wikipedia


19 January 2012 Last updated at 12:42 GMT

Wikipedia "thank you" pageWikipedia's blacked-out message of yesterday's protest was replaced with a white "thank you"

Related Stories

After a 24-hour blackout, Wikipedia has returned to full working order but declared: "We're not done yet."
The site had blocked its content for 24 hours in protest at proposed anti-piracy legislation in the US.
The encyclopaedia said the site had been viewed 162 million times, with eight million people following instructions to contact politicians.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

21/06 Jimmy Wales: “President Medvedev is the only world leader who actually understands the Internet”

June 21, 2011
At a meeting in Moscow, the founder of Wikipedia said he was encouraged about the future of the Internet in Russia.

Jimmy Wales: “President Medvedev is the only world leader who actually understands the Internet”
Jimmy Wales in Moscow. Source: ITAR-TASS
With more than 720,000 articles, the Russian-language section on Wikipedia is one of the site's largest. According to site founder Jimmy Wales, it is also one of the fastest-growing. Wales came to Russia in the middle of June to talk with the local wiki-community about freedom of speech, copyright protections and the future of the media.

The month before his visit to Russia, Wales participated in the eG8, a precursor to the G8 meetings in Deauville, France. In deference to the increasing role the web is playing in politics and economics today, French President Nicolas Sarkozy invited the heads of the world’s leading Internet companies to gather in Paris to discuss the future of the Internet and its place in society. In addition to Wales, Facebook CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg, the chairman of the board of Google Eric Schmidt and representatives from Microsoft, the BBC and eBay also participated in the meeting.

“Unfortunately Sarkozy thinks that the Internet must be controlled and regulated,” Wales said, describing the eG8 discussions during his press conference in Moscow. “At the G8 meeting, President Medvedev was the only person to say anything sensible whatsoever.”

Medvedev’s enthusiasm for all things online is one reason Wales is so excited about the future of the Internet in Russia. At his press conference, Wales suggested that all the journalists who planned to write about the event title their stories “Medvedev is the only world leader who actually understands the Internet.”

“He (Medvedev) put forward some proposals on the reform of the copyright law,” said Wales. “He understands that the problem is not only the issue of content producers versus pirates, although this question is of course important. He is also proposing that the law should explicitly recognize that there are people who want to share their work freely. So I’m excited about the future of innovation and the internet in Russia because of this.”

All the content in Wikipedia is licensed through Creative Commons, which creates licenses specifically for people who want to share their work for free. In many places around the globe, their main task is to make sure that the licenses are consistent with local law. Unfortunately, Russian copyright law is not structured in a way that allows it to work with the Creative Commons model. Wales, however, is optimistic that the problems can be overcome. “Of course it’s too early to know for sure, but I’m happy that President Medvedev asked for an update to the copyright law to fix this problem,” he said.

The June trip was not Wales’s first visit to Russia. After a trip in 2009, he stated in an interview that he found Russian society very closed and lacking in information. Has the situation changed?

“I can only say what I hear from my community of editors in Russia,” said Wales. “I think the situation has already much improved, but even today there may be some inappropriate pressures on journalists. Obviously Russia today is not the Russia of 50 years ago. And it’s a good thing.”

In response to questions from the audience about factual errors in Wikipedia articles, Wales explained that the best thing to do is to get in contact with the wiki-community. His Wikimedia foundation is also increasingly doing outreach to organizations that are interested in improving Wikipedia, although this work is neverending.

“I suppose we will never achieve perfection, because we are just human beings,” said Wales a bit sadly, summing up the situation.  

The popularity of Wikipedia depends on many factors that are out of its founder’s control such as Internet access (and the speed thereof) and even literacy. For Wales, the most important task in Wikipedia’s future is to have the site operate in all the world’s languages, particularly the languages of the developing world. As the next billion people start coming online, they will want to work in their own languages – “All of them,” said Wales 

Saturday, June 4, 2011

Ricardo Piglia


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ricardo Piglia (born on November 24, 1941 in Adrogué and raised in Mar del Plata) is one of the foremost contemporary Argentine writers,[1]known equally for his fiction (several collections of short stories; the novels "Artificial Respiration", 1980; "The Absent City", 1992; "Burnt Money", 1997) and his criticism (1986 "Criticism and Fiction", 1999 "Brief Forms", 2005 "The Last Reader".
Piglia has received a number of awards, including the "Premio Iberoamericano de las Letras 2005""Premio Planeta 1997", and "Premio Casa de las Américas 1967". He currently teaches Latin American literature at Princeton UniversityUnited States.

Works

[edit]Essays

  • 1986 Criticism and Fiction (Crítica y ficción)
  • 1993 "Argentina in Pieces" ("La Argentina en pedazos")
  • 1999 Brief Forms (Formas breves)
  • 2000 Dictionary of the Novel of Macedonio Fernández (Diccionario de la novela de Macedonio Fernández)
  • 2005 The Last Reader (El último lector)

[edit]Novels

  • 1980 "Artificial Respiration" (Respiración artificial)
  • 1992 "The Absent City" (La ciudad ausente)
  • 1997 "Burnt Money" (Plata Quemada)
  • 2010 "Nocturnal Target" (Blanco nocturno)

[edit]Short story collections

  • 1967 The Invasion (La Invasión)
  • 1975 "Assumed Name"(Nombre Falso)
  • 1988 "Perpetual Prison" (Prisión perpetua)
  • 1995 "Moral Tales" (Cuentos morales)

[edit]References

Monday, February 21, 2011

20/02 Egyptians Were Unplugged, and Uncowed

February 20, 2011
By NOAM COHEN

FOR a segment of the young people of Egypt, the date to remember is not when Egyptians first took to the streets to shake off the 30-year rule of Hosni Mubarak.

Rather, it is three days later — Jan. 28, 2011 — the day the Internet died, or more precisely, was put to sleep by the Mubarak government.

That was when some of them discovered a couple of polar but compatible truths. One, the streets still had the power to act as Twitter was unplugged. And two, the Internet had become so integral to society that it wasn’t unreasonable to consider a constitutional guarantee of free access to it.

“It felt exactly like going back in time, but in today’s world,” Ahmed Gabr, a medical student and the editor of the Swalif.net technology blog, wrote in an e-mail.

Mr. Gabr included his detailed timeline of interruptions in communications services during the protests: when service at Facebook and Twitter first became spotty, when text-messaging was interrupted.

His description for Jan. 28: “Egypt is now officially offline.”

In interviews by telephone and e-mail young Egyptians like Mr. Gabr — tech-savvy but not necessarily political — were hardly Internet utopians. They had, after all, seen firsthand how shutting down the Internet had failed to stop the momentum of the protests. But they did make a case that the Internet was an irreplaceable part of Egyptian life, especially for the young. Nothing more and nothing less.

The removal of the Internet by their government, they said, was a reminder that they were not free; not truly part of the wider world that they know so well thanks to technologies like the Web.

“Frankly, I didn’t participate in Jan. 25 protests, but the Web sites’ blockade and communications blackout on Jan. 28 was one of the main reasons I, and many others, were pushed to the streets,” wrote Ramez Mohamed, a 26-year-old computer science graduate who works in telecommunications.

“It was the first time for me to feel digitally disabled,” he wrote. “Imagine sitting at your home, having no single connection with the outer world. I took the decision, ‘this is nonsense, we are not sheep in their herd,’ I went down and joined the protests.”

For Mr. Mohamed, as for Mr. Gabr, it was like going back in time. “During the five days of the Internet blackout, I was at Tahrir Square for almost every day,” he recalled, referring to the hive of the Cairo protests. “Tell you what, I didn’t miss Twitter, I can confidently say that Tahrir was a street Twitter. Almost everyone sharing in a political discussion, trying to announce something or circulate news, even if they are rumors, simply retweets.”

Laughing at how what is old is new again, Mr. Mohamed ended this e-mail passage with a smilely face icon.The idea that the Egyptian government could simply shut down the Internet (something Libya now does periodically) was a shock to outsiders — even a bit of a technical achievement. And the decision to do it ran against the grain of what had been the government’s relatively open policy toward the Internet, said Andrew Bossone, who spent the past five years in Cairo writing about technology.

“When I went to Tunisia about a year ago, I couldn’t get onto YouTube or Al Jazeera,” Mr. Bossone said in an interview from Beirut, where he now lives. “Egypt didn’t really block any Web sites.”

He said the policy had raised expectations: “It’s not just about Facebook, Twitter or YouTube. It’s about access to this technology that everybody else has. A sense of entitlement. The idea that everybody else has it, why can’t I have it?”

Perhaps that sense of entitlement is behind the discussions that Mr. Gabr reported hearing. “Some friends are now even demanding, jokingly or seriously,” he wrote, “that a new or amended constitution should emphasize on a non-negotiable ‘right to Internet access’ for everybody.”

This comfort with a relatively free-flowing Internet was on display in 2008, when Wikipedia’s annual convention was held in Alexandria, at the new high-tech library built near where the legendary Library of Alexandria had been.

Filled with much of Egypt’s technical class, which included many women, the gathering was billed as an effort to bolster Arabic Wikipedia. The relatively low number of articles didn’t accurately reflect the importance of technology in the Arab world, the thinking went. Many Egyptians had an active, even bustling, Facebook presence, and attempts were made to organize protests at the site on behalf of bloggers who had been persecuted by the government.

Moushira Elamrawy, an advocate for free culture and free software in Alexandria, remembered the conference as a chance for the budding techie community in Egypt to meet in person. Two years later, the Internet shutdown showed the need for an independent community of technical experts to protect Egyptians’ connection to the world.

The day the Internet was shut off represented a point of no return, Ms. Elamrawy said. “It was definitely one of the most provoking things. We felt abandoned — completely isolated from the world.”

Ms. Elamrawy, who is 27 and trained as an architect but consults on development for free culture projects like Wikipedia, spoke by telephone from San Francisco, where she headed after spending the protests in Alexandria.

The protesters, she recalled, realized that in the time of darkness, it was particularly important to document what happened. They knew, she said, that at some point the Internet would be back, and people would want to know about the interim.

Ahmad Balal, a radiologist at Cairo University Hospitals who was a medical student during the Wikipedia conference in 2008, was one such chronicler. Mr. Balal wrote in an e-mail that his Facebook wall was the best way to relive what he experienced during the protests.

He had joined the protests at the start, on Jan. 25, but there is an eerie gap on his Facebook wall when the Internet was down, and friends from outside Egypt asked how he was but received no reply.

On Feb. 2, 5:18 a.m., when the Internet was back, he wrote in English, one of the few times he has: “The Internet is back to Egypt. Mr. Hosni Mubarak has offered it back to us after blocking it for only 5 days. Such a generous man!!!”

Forty-two minutes later, there appeared a photograph of a crowded Tahrir Square. The caption read, “I was there.”