Showing posts with label Qaddafi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Qaddafi. Show all posts

Sunday, July 3, 2011

02/07 Đại tá Gaddafi dọa tấn công châu Âu


Thứ Bảy, 02/07/2011 07:30

(NLĐO)- Nhà lãnh đạo Libya Muammar Gaddafi ngày 1-7 dọa sẽ tấn công châu Âu nếu NATO không ngừng chiến dịch không kích Libya.

Đại tá Gaddafi tuyên bố lực lượng trung thành với ông có thể đưa trận chiến tới châu Âu.


Đại tá Gaddafi tuyên bố lực lượng trung thành với ông có thể đưa trận chiến tới châu Âu

Phát biểu trước những người ủng hộ tại quảng trường tại thủ đô Tripoli,  ông Gaddafi nói: “Nếu quyết định, chúng tôi sẽ ồ ạt tấn công châu Âu. Do đó, chúng tôi cảnh cáo, NATO hãy rút lui trước khi phải đối mặt với một thảm họa”.

“Chúng tôi cũng có thể nhằm vào các mục tiêu nhà cửa, văn phòng, và những gia đình, biến tất cả chúng thành những mục tiêu quân sự như những gì họ đang làm với chúng tôi ở Libya”, ông Gaddafi tiếp tục.

Hiện ông Gaddafi đang là đối tượng truy nã của Tòa án Hình sự Quốc tế vì tội ác chống lại loài người trong suốt cuộc binh biến ở Libya. 
Ngày 1-7 diễn ra một cuộc tuần hành lớn ở Libya của những người ủng hộ ông Gaddafi, đây là một trong những cuộc tuần hành lớn nhất của lực lượng trung thành với đại tá Gaddafi trong thời gian gần đây.

Vị lãnh đạo Libya hơn 40 năm này kêu gọi những người ủng hộ tuần hành tới vùng núi phía Tây để tước bỏ toàn bộ vũ khí mà Pháp đã cung cấp cho phe nổi dậy.
Thu Hằng (Theo RIA Novosti)

Saturday, July 2, 2011

02/07 Assassination is a two-edged sword


Opinions

By Evan Thomas, Saturday, July 2, 8:10 AM


Is the United States government trying to kill Moammar Gaddafi? Not officially. For the record, the United States issupporting a NATO mission to protect civilians from Gaddafi’s forces. NATO jets are bombing Gaddafi’s command and control centers. If Gaddafi dies, it may be from a French bomb. But the United States pays more than a fifth of NATO’s costsand provides at least some of the high-tech intelligence used in bombing runs. If Gaddafi is killed in one of those raids, America will have a hard time convincing the world that Gaddafi was not the target.
President Obama would never be so crude as to say “dead or alive,” and he has told Congress that he has no plans to use the American military to assassinate Gaddafi. But by making clear that he wants regime change and signing off on the NATO strikes, he is, however indirectly, taking on responsibility for attempting to kill a head of state.
That is no small step for an American president. Yet there has been little discussion of assassination in Congress or in the media. There should be more. It is worth looking at the history of assassinations and asking whether the president and Congress really want the United States to support efforts to kill heads of state, even wicked ones such as Gaddafi. Aside from the moral questions, assassination invites instability and blowback.
In the West, assassination was a fairly common tool in international relations until the late 18th century. Then nation-states pulled back. The rules of war recognized that while states could make war on each other, heads of state should be protected. In 1789, Thomas Jefferson wrote to James Madison, “Assassination, poison, perjury. . . .All of these were legitimate principles in the dark ages which intervened between ancient and modern civilizations, but exploded and [were] held in just horror in the eighteenth century.” In 1938, the British government rejected a proposal by the British military attache in Berlin to assassinate Adolf Hitler on the grounds that it was “unsportsmanlike.” As late as 1944, the British government was divided over a plan by the British Special Operations Executive to liquidate the Nazi leader.
As Ward Thomas, a professor at the College of the Holy Cross, writes in “The Ethics of Destruction,” the norm against assassination gradually loosened after World War II. It was recognized that heads of state could be terrorists and war criminals — if not human monsters. In 1986, after Gaddafi was held responsible for a terrorist attack that killed American servicemen in a nightclub in Berlin, the United States bombed Gaddafi’s tent in Libya, killing some of his relatives. In the opening blow of the 2003 Iraq war, American bombers attempted to kill Saddam Hussein, believing, thanks to faulty intelligence, that he was at a location outside Baghdad. The U.S. executive order banning assassinations, adopted after earlier CIA plots against Cuba’s Fidel Castro and others were exposed in 1975, does not apply in wartime. “The laws of war clearly permit states to use lethal force against the chain of command of military forces who are engaged in armed conflict,” says former CIA general counsel Jeffrey H. Smith. “But we need to be very careful how we use that force, to make sure we are not setting a dangerous precedent.”
As was much discussed last week, technology such as “smart” bombs and aerial drones allows the United States to zero in on individuals. Drones are effective and, for the most part, reduce civilian casualties. But they are turning a crude bomb into a sniper’s rifle. America is far ahead in the race to build better drones, making them small and in the future probably even tiny, like sinister birds and insects. But other nations (and terrorists) will catch up. I can’t help thinking of that not-so-distant day when they may use such weapons; after all, Gaddafi blew up an American airliner after U.S. warplanes bombed his tent in 1986.
It has never been clear whether President Dwight Eisenhower gave the CIA the go-ahead to try to assassinate Castro and Congo strongman Patrice Lumumba in 1960. But Ike surely had it right when he scolded a staffer for making a joke about “bumping off” Lumumba. “That is beyond the pale,” Eisenhower said, according to his staff secretary, Andrew Goodpaster. “We will not discuss such things. Once you start that kind of business, there is no telling where it will end.”
Evan Thomas is an author and professor of journalism at Princeton University.

Monday, June 6, 2011

05/06 Libya: Eman al-Obeidi leaves for US


Eman al-Obeidi addresses journalists in Tripoli's Rixos Hotel in MarchEman al-Obeidi told journalists in Tripoli that she had been assaulted
A Libyan woman who said she was raped by supporters of Col Muammar Gaddafi has left eastern Libya for the US, according to her sister.
Eman al-Obeidi was heading from the rebel-held city of Benghazi to Washington DC, her sister Marwa said.
Eman al-Obeidi's case came to attention when she rushed into Tripoli's Rixos Hotel in March and told her story to foreign journalists staying there.
Earlier this week, Ms Obeidi was deported from Qatar.
She had sought refuge there after arriving from Libya, via Tunisia.
Dispute in Qatar
In Benghazi, Ms Obeidi's home city, Marwa al-Obeidi said a human rights group helped by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had organised for Eman and their father to travel in a private plane to Washington, via Malta and Austria.
"We just want a chance for her to be treated psychologically and to rest," she told the Associated Press news agency. "My sister has just been through so much."
She also said Qatari authorities had been friendly to her sister until a few hours before she was made to leave.
"Eman wanted to travel directly to America from Qatar, but for some logistical reasons, Qatar wouldn't allow it."
As Ms Obeidi recounted her story to reporters in in March, government minders grabbed her and dragged her away.
She vanished for several days before turning up in Tunisia.
Ms Obeidi said she had escaped with the help of defecting military officers.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

05/05 Gaddafi's Ukrainian nurse seeks asylum in Norway


Muammar Gaddafi and Galyna Kolotnytska (file image)According to a leaked US cable, Colonel Gaddafi relied heavily on Galyna Kolotnytska, right

A Ukrainian nurse described as a close confidante of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has applied for political asylum in Norway.

Galyna Kolotnytska was propelled into the spotlight when Wikileaks published a US embassy cable saying Colonel Gaddafi "relies heavily" on her.

It quoted a US diplomat describing her as as a "voluptuous blonde".

Ms Kolotnytska was evacuated from Libya in February and went into hiding in Ukraine to escape media attention.

She reportedly moved to Oslo in March to escape further media harassment.

"We have been informed by the immigration services that she has sought political asylum in Norway," Norwegian Police Security Service spokesman Siv Alsen said.

Officials gave no further details of the application.

The US cable revealed by Wikileaks said Ms Kolotnytska always travelled with Col Gaddafi as only she "knows his routine".

Immigration lawyer Arvid Humlen told the Associated Press that the asylum application was unlikely to be granted.

However, he said Ms Kolotnytska could be given permission to stay in Norway due to "additional threats" such as the risk of being targeted by Libyan agents.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

21/04 リビア介入―「人道のため」忘れるな

 カダフィ政権に反乱が起きたリビアが混迷している。国際社会が軍事介入に踏み切ったが、収束への道筋はみえないままだ。このまま戦闘をエスカレートさせてはいけない。

 英米仏を中心とする多国籍軍がリビア政府軍を攻撃して1カ月になる。反体制派への報復・虐殺を阻止するための人道的介入のはずだったが、その限界が見えてきた。いったん勢いづいた反体制派に対し、政府軍が巻き返している。

 西部にある第3の都市ミスラタは、2月末から政府軍に包囲されている。無差別砲撃や狙撃で連日、多くの犠牲者が出ており、水や食糧も不足している。狙撃兵が市街にひそみ、外出もままならないという。「このままでは皆殺しにされる」という声は痛ましい。

 多国籍軍を指揮する北大西洋条約機構(NATO)は、政府軍の戦力の約3割を破壊したと発表した。だが、反体制派の部隊への誤爆も相次ぎ、首都トリポリへの空爆で市民が巻き添えになったという情報もある。

 戦闘が長期化するほど、人道危機が深まる。政府軍が攻勢をかければ、阻止しようと多国籍軍も爆撃をエスカレートさせる。この悪循環を断ち切らなくてはならない。

 行き詰まりをうけ、英国は軍事顧問団を反体制派の拠点ベンガジに派遣する方針だ。連絡調整や後方支援にあたり、直接の軍事作戦や訓練にはかかわらない、としている。

 軍事介入を認めた国連安全保障理事会の決議は「外国軍によるリビア占領はいかなる形でも除外する」として、地上軍の派遣を禁じている。顧問団は直接には戦闘に加わらぬというが、当初の決議の枠を超えて内戦にてこ入れを図るなら、安全保障理事会の新たな決議が必要だ。

 なし崩しに軍事行動が変質すれば、正統性を欠いたイラク戦争の二の舞いになりかねない。

Saturday, April 9, 2011

08/04 NATO Expresses Regret for Airstrike


Esam al-Fetori/Reuters

A wounded rebel fighter, above, received treatment on Thursday at a hospital in Ajdabiya, Libya. More Photos »