Page 4
Saturday, June 4, 2011
Ricardo Piglia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ricardo Piglia (born on November 24, 1941 in Adrogué and raised in Mar del Plata) is one of the foremost contemporary Argentine writers,[1]known equally for his fiction (several collections of short stories; the novels "Artificial Respiration", 1980; "The Absent City", 1992; "Burnt Money", 1997) and his criticism (1986 "Criticism and Fiction", 1999 "Brief Forms", 2005 "The Last Reader".
Piglia has received a number of awards, including the "Premio Iberoamericano de las Letras 2005", "Premio Planeta 1997", and "Premio Casa de las Américas 1967". He currently teaches Latin American literature at Princeton University, United States.
Works
[edit]Essays
- 1986 Criticism and Fiction (Crítica y ficción)
- 1993 "Argentina in Pieces" ("La Argentina en pedazos")
- 1999 Brief Forms (Formas breves)
- 2000 Dictionary of the Novel of Macedonio Fernández (Diccionario de la novela de Macedonio Fernández)
- 2005 The Last Reader (El último lector)
[edit]Novels
- 1980 "Artificial Respiration" (Respiración artificial)
- 1992 "The Absent City" (La ciudad ausente)
- 1997 "Burnt Money" (Plata Quemada)
- 2010 "Nocturnal Target" (Blanco nocturno)
[edit]Short story collections
- 1967 The Invasion (La Invasión)
- 1975 "Assumed Name"(Nombre Falso)
- 1988 "Perpetual Prison" (Prisión perpetua)
- 1995 "Moral Tales" (Cuentos morales)
[edit]References
- ^ "Ricardo Piglia" (in Spanish). Literatura Argentina Contemporánea. Retrieved 20 May 2011.
03/06 NYT editorial: How a Democracy Works
EDITORIAL
Published: June 3, 2011
President Obama, who has spent two and a half years not delivering on his promise to fix immigration, gave a speech in El Paso last month and cloaked his failure in tough statistics — this many new border agents, that much fencing, these thousands of deportations. Related
Times Topic: Immigration
Readers' Comments
Share your thoughts.
As for the other parts of reform — where millions of immigrants get right with the law and get on with becoming Americans, where workers are better protected — he threw up his hands. He said immigration advocates “wish I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that’s not how a democracy works.”O.K., so maybe it isn’t. But there is a lot President Obama can and should do, using the discretion and authority granted to the executive branch and its agencies to make the system work better:Mr. Obama can bolster public safety by pulling the plug on Secure Communities, a program that sends fingerprints of everyone booked by state or local police to Department of Homeland Security databases to be checked for immigration violations. It was supposed to focus on dangerous felons, but the heavy majority of those it catches are noncriminals or minor offenders — more than 30 percent have no convictions for anything.The president should listen to the many law enforcement professionals and local officials, like the governors of New York and Illinois, who want nothing to do with Secure Communities. They say it endangers the public by catching the wrong people and stifling community cooperation with law enforcement.The president can push much harder against the noxious anti-immigrant laws proliferating in the national free-for-all. The administration sued to stop Arizona’s radical scheme. But Utah, Alabama, Indiana and Georgia are trying to do the same thing.He can grant relief from deportation to young people who would have qualified for the Dream Act, a filibustered bill that grants legal status to the innocent undocumented who enter college or the military. He can do the same for workers who would qualify for the Power Act, a stalled bill that seeks to prevent employers from using the threat of deportation and immigration raids to retaliate against employees who press for their rights on the job.He can resist Republican lawmakers who want mandatory nationwide use of E-Verify, a flawed hiring database, which would likely lead to thousands of Americans losing their job because of data errors. A December report by the Government Accountability Office warned that E-Verify is plagued by inaccurate records and vulnerable to identity theft and employer fraud.He can order the citizenship agency to keep families intact by making it easier for illegal immigrants who are immediate relatives of American citizens to fix their status without having to leave the country. Many already qualify for green cards but are afraid to risk getting stuck abroad under too-strict laws that could bar their re-entry.He can bolster the civil rights division of the Department of Justice and give the Department of Labor more tools to strengthen protections for all workers and the authority to combat labor trafficking. Such authority now lies with Homeland Security, which means many immigrants are too frightened to speak up when their rights are abused.As President Obama said in El Paso, the United States needs to address “the real human toll of a broken immigration system.” There’s work to do, Mr. President.
President Obama, who has spent two and a half years not delivering on his promise to fix immigration, gave a speech in El Paso last month and cloaked his failure in tough statistics — this many new border agents, that much fencing, these thousands of deportations.
Related
Times Topic: Immigration
Readers' Comments
Share your thoughts.
As for the other parts of reform — where millions of immigrants get right with the law and get on with becoming Americans, where workers are better protected — he threw up his hands. He said immigration advocates “wish I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that’s not how a democracy works.”
O.K., so maybe it isn’t. But there is a lot President Obama can and should do, using the discretion and authority granted to the executive branch and its agencies to make the system work better:
Mr. Obama can bolster public safety by pulling the plug on Secure Communities, a program that sends fingerprints of everyone booked by state or local police to Department of Homeland Security databases to be checked for immigration violations. It was supposed to focus on dangerous felons, but the heavy majority of those it catches are noncriminals or minor offenders — more than 30 percent have no convictions for anything.
The president should listen to the many law enforcement professionals and local officials, like the governors of New York and Illinois, who want nothing to do with Secure Communities. They say it endangers the public by catching the wrong people and stifling community cooperation with law enforcement.
The president can push much harder against the noxious anti-immigrant laws proliferating in the national free-for-all. The administration sued to stop Arizona’s radical scheme. But Utah, Alabama, Indiana and Georgia are trying to do the same thing.
He can grant relief from deportation to young people who would have qualified for the Dream Act, a filibustered bill that grants legal status to the innocent undocumented who enter college or the military. He can do the same for workers who would qualify for the Power Act, a stalled bill that seeks to prevent employers from using the threat of deportation and immigration raids to retaliate against employees who press for their rights on the job.
He can resist Republican lawmakers who want mandatory nationwide use of E-Verify, a flawed hiring database, which would likely lead to thousands of Americans losing their job because of data errors. A December report by the Government Accountability Office warned that E-Verify is plagued by inaccurate records and vulnerable to identity theft and employer fraud.
He can order the citizenship agency to keep families intact by making it easier for illegal immigrants who are immediate relatives of American citizens to fix their status without having to leave the country. Many already qualify for green cards but are afraid to risk getting stuck abroad under too-strict laws that could bar their re-entry.
He can bolster the civil rights division of the Department of Justice and give the Department of Labor more tools to strengthen protections for all workers and the authority to combat labor trafficking. Such authority now lies with Homeland Security, which means many immigrants are too frightened to speak up when their rights are abused.
As President Obama said in El Paso, the United States needs to address “the real human toll of a broken immigration system.” There’s work to do, Mr. President.
Do My Pores Look Big to You?
SKIN DEEP
Ann Johansson for The New York Times
SUCKED AWAY Tony Silla performs pore treatment on Julie Kokesch, starting with a heat mask, left, followed by extraction, center, and a galvanic current mask, right, which he said stimulates collagen.
By CATHERINE SAINT LOUIS
Published: June 1, 2011
LATELY Justine Heilner, 37, a landscape architect in Manhattan, has been noticing dirt in more than just her gardens. When she gazes into the mirror, she also sees what looks like grime in the enlarged pores on her face that used to be unnoticeable. Alas, aging brings so many fresh thrills.Related
Beauty Spots (June 2, 2011)
Tony Cenicola/The New York Times
SCRUBBED OUT Products that take off dead skin cells chemically or physically with grains or tiny beads can make the skin look smoother, as can cleansers with salicylic or glycolic acid.To get a poreless look, Ms. Heilner sometimes uses primer, a kind of under-makeup spackle, especially when she performs as a trapeze artist. But these days, plenty of women don’t leave the house without first achieving a flawless smooth look.“Girls on the subway have so much more makeup now, and look moreproduced than they used to,” she said, adding, “If I had HDTV, I would be more obsessed.”Some fret about fine lines and sun spots; others are fixated on pores. High-definition television has arguably upped the ante. Consider the celebrity with glistening teeth and yogic arms, but a jarringly pock-marked nose in close-ups. Viewers think, “If her pores look like that, what do mine look like?” said Dr. Mary Lupo, a clinical professor of dermatology at Tulane University School of Medicine.Like home renovators who overhaul the kitchen only to then find fault with the master bath, some dermatology patients feel that, once their wrinkles are relaxed and their brown spots treated, their pores stand out. Such is the level of worry that doctors have nicknamed the condition “porexia.”“There’s a level of obsessiveness,” Dr. Lupo said. “Instead of looking at the global picture, they overfocus on an individual component of the picture.”It’s not just women who are concerned about large, perpetually clogged pores. Tony Silla, an owner of the Face Place and the head aesthetician at its Los Angeles flagship, said men vent about the craterlike look of enlarged pores more now than when he got into the business 16 years ago. “They don’t want their nose to look like their grandfather’s nose,” he said.For more than a decade, the grooming brand Anthony for Men has sold a deep-pore clay cleansing mask. At first, convincing boardroom types they needed it was “a little bit of a challenge,” said John C. Gallo, the company’s director of product education. But today men worry about looking shiny or clogged and, he said, “maintaining a normal pore size.”Just try getting them to admit it. Brian Giambalvo, 34, a Brooklynite who works in financial services, inherited oily skin, so he said that keeping his pores clean is definitely a priority, but he wouldn’t go so far as to get treatment. “I could care less about their size,” he said. “I see men out there who have no visible pores. It works for them. But this is me.”AH, the serenity of accepting what you cannot change (at least not radically). Pore size is mostly genetically determined and grows with age, despite the conventional wisdom that only teenagers are swiping their noses with Stridex. The more collagen lost, the looser the pores’ natural support structure becomes, making them great nets for dead skin cells. “Loosening that girdle over time” makes them look bigger, said Dr. Amy Derick, a dermatologist in Barrington, Ill.Milena Turok, the director of aesthetic procedures at Dermatology Partners in Wellesley, Mass., said she hears regularly from people hovering around 40: “My skin sags, and my pores are large.”Even some elderly people are bothered enough by their dilated pores to take action. “It gets to the point that they are so obvious it’s not attractive at all,” said Dr. Marta I. Rendon, a dermatologist in Boca Raton, Fla., whose practice has two medical aestheticians booked to capacity. “A couple of elderly guys come to get facials with the girls,” Dr. Rendon said.No matter what marketers might lead the gullible to believe, pores cannot be shrunk permanently. But they can look smaller, temporarily.Sales of face primers like Smashbox’s Photo Finish Foundation Primer, products that give a smooth canvas for makeup, have almost doubled in dollar volume since 2007, said Karen Grant, vice president for beauty at the NPD Group, a market research firm. “We all have this at our disposal,” Ms. Grant said, explaining the prevailing logic. “If we don’t utilize it, we’re slacking.”Some of the pore-paranoid turn to facials that include extraction, and exfoliation (taking off dead skin cells either chemically or physically with grains or tiny beads). Mrs. Turok recommends Dermalogica’s Daily Microfoliant (her office’s best seller) and Skinceuticals’ Retexturing Activator. After such maintenance, “the whole skin looks smoother,” Mrs. Turok said.Dr. Fredric Brandt, a dermatologist in Manhattan and Coral Gables, Fla., agreed. “Keeping pores cleaned out is going to make them look a lot smaller,” he said. (Somewhat hyperbolically, Dr. Brandt’s seven-product line for pores, which includes a blackhead extractor called a “vacuum cleaner,” was renamed Pores No More in 2009.)But like exercise, physical exfoliation even once or twice a week can seem an unpleasant task. “Most people surprisingly don’t exfoliate,” Mr. Silla said. “It’s laziness.”Even the lazy, though, can use a cleanser with salicylic acid or glycolic acid routinely, or get a prescription for a tretinoin like Atralin or Renova, if it doesn’t irritate their skin (causing redness and flakes on top of the pore problem).Dr. Rendon’s practice also has an Isolaz machine, which has a suction device and is cleared by the Food and Drug Administration to treat mild to moderate acne. It has been a hit among her female patients in their 30s and 40s who like its deep pore cleaning. “It sucks all the debris and sebaceous material out of the pore, then shines a light that shrinks the sebaceous gland,” said Dr. Rendon, who is a clinical associate professor of dermatology at the University of Miami School of Medicine. (She charges $200 to $300 per Isolaz treatment.)Dr. Rendon added that there is another reason to fear sun damage: “It leads to bigger-looking pores,” she said. She recommends daily, year-round use of a sunscreen. If the damage is already done, treatments that aim to stimulate collagen — for instance, intense pulsed light (IPL) and certain lasers or peels — can improve the appearance of pores for 4 to 12 months at most, Dr. Lupo said.But “it will require constant maintenance,” she warned. Alas: “We have no permanent solution to make pores appear smaller.”
LATELY Justine Heilner, 37, a landscape architect in Manhattan, has been noticing dirt in more than just her gardens. When she gazes into the mirror, she also sees what looks like grime in the enlarged pores on her face that used to be unnoticeable. Alas, aging brings so many fresh thrills.
Related
Beauty Spots (June 2, 2011)
Tony Cenicola/The New York Times
SCRUBBED OUT Products that take off dead skin cells chemically or physically with grains or tiny beads can make the skin look smoother, as can cleansers with salicylic or glycolic acid.
To get a poreless look, Ms. Heilner sometimes uses primer, a kind of under-makeup spackle, especially when she performs as a trapeze artist. But these days, plenty of women don’t leave the house without first achieving a flawless smooth look.
“Girls on the subway have so much more makeup now, and look moreproduced than they used to,” she said, adding, “If I had HDTV, I would be more obsessed.”
Some fret about fine lines and sun spots; others are fixated on pores. High-definition television has arguably upped the ante. Consider the celebrity with glistening teeth and yogic arms, but a jarringly pock-marked nose in close-ups. Viewers think, “If her pores look like that, what do mine look like?” said Dr. Mary Lupo, a clinical professor of dermatology at Tulane University School of Medicine.
Like home renovators who overhaul the kitchen only to then find fault with the master bath, some dermatology patients feel that, once their wrinkles are relaxed and their brown spots treated, their pores stand out. Such is the level of worry that doctors have nicknamed the condition “porexia.”
“There’s a level of obsessiveness,” Dr. Lupo said. “Instead of looking at the global picture, they overfocus on an individual component of the picture.”
It’s not just women who are concerned about large, perpetually clogged pores. Tony Silla, an owner of the Face Place and the head aesthetician at its Los Angeles flagship, said men vent about the craterlike look of enlarged pores more now than when he got into the business 16 years ago. “They don’t want their nose to look like their grandfather’s nose,” he said.
For more than a decade, the grooming brand Anthony for Men has sold a deep-pore clay cleansing mask. At first, convincing boardroom types they needed it was “a little bit of a challenge,” said John C. Gallo, the company’s director of product education. But today men worry about looking shiny or clogged and, he said, “maintaining a normal pore size.”
Just try getting them to admit it. Brian Giambalvo, 34, a Brooklynite who works in financial services, inherited oily skin, so he said that keeping his pores clean is definitely a priority, but he wouldn’t go so far as to get treatment. “I could care less about their size,” he said. “I see men out there who have no visible pores. It works for them. But this is me.”
AH, the serenity of accepting what you cannot change (at least not radically). Pore size is mostly genetically determined and grows with age, despite the conventional wisdom that only teenagers are swiping their noses with Stridex. The more collagen lost, the looser the pores’ natural support structure becomes, making them great nets for dead skin cells. “Loosening that girdle over time” makes them look bigger, said Dr. Amy Derick, a dermatologist in Barrington, Ill.
Milena Turok, the director of aesthetic procedures at Dermatology Partners in Wellesley, Mass., said she hears regularly from people hovering around 40: “My skin sags, and my pores are large.”
Even some elderly people are bothered enough by their dilated pores to take action. “It gets to the point that they are so obvious it’s not attractive at all,” said Dr. Marta I. Rendon, a dermatologist in Boca Raton, Fla., whose practice has two medical aestheticians booked to capacity. “A couple of elderly guys come to get facials with the girls,” Dr. Rendon said.
No matter what marketers might lead the gullible to believe, pores cannot be shrunk permanently. But they can look smaller, temporarily.
Sales of face primers like Smashbox’s Photo Finish Foundation Primer, products that give a smooth canvas for makeup, have almost doubled in dollar volume since 2007, said Karen Grant, vice president for beauty at the NPD Group, a market research firm. “We all have this at our disposal,” Ms. Grant said, explaining the prevailing logic. “If we don’t utilize it, we’re slacking.”
Some of the pore-paranoid turn to facials that include extraction, and exfoliation (taking off dead skin cells either chemically or physically with grains or tiny beads). Mrs. Turok recommends Dermalogica’s Daily Microfoliant (her office’s best seller) and Skinceuticals’ Retexturing Activator. After such maintenance, “the whole skin looks smoother,” Mrs. Turok said.
Dr. Fredric Brandt, a dermatologist in Manhattan and Coral Gables, Fla., agreed. “Keeping pores cleaned out is going to make them look a lot smaller,” he said. (Somewhat hyperbolically, Dr. Brandt’s seven-product line for pores, which includes a blackhead extractor called a “vacuum cleaner,” was renamed Pores No More in 2009.)
But like exercise, physical exfoliation even once or twice a week can seem an unpleasant task. “Most people surprisingly don’t exfoliate,” Mr. Silla said. “It’s laziness.”
Even the lazy, though, can use a cleanser with salicylic acid or glycolic acid routinely, or get a prescription for a tretinoin like Atralin or Renova, if it doesn’t irritate their skin (causing redness and flakes on top of the pore problem).
Dr. Rendon’s practice also has an Isolaz machine, which has a suction device and is cleared by the Food and Drug Administration to treat mild to moderate acne. It has been a hit among her female patients in their 30s and 40s who like its deep pore cleaning. “It sucks all the debris and sebaceous material out of the pore, then shines a light that shrinks the sebaceous gland,” said Dr. Rendon, who is a clinical associate professor of dermatology at the University of Miami School of Medicine. (She charges $200 to $300 per Isolaz treatment.)
Dr. Rendon added that there is another reason to fear sun damage: “It leads to bigger-looking pores,” she said. She recommends daily, year-round use of a sunscreen. If the damage is already done, treatments that aim to stimulate collagen — for instance, intense pulsed light (IPL) and certain lasers or peels — can improve the appearance of pores for 4 to 12 months at most, Dr. Lupo said.
But “it will require constant maintenance,” she warned. Alas: “We have no permanent solution to make pores appear smaller.”
02/06 Poland: Auschwitz Sign to Hang Indoors
WORLD BRIEFING | EUROPE
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: June 2, 2011
Related
Sign Over Auschwitz Gate Is Stolen (December 19, 2009)
Infamous Sign at Auschwitz That Was Stolen Is Found(December 21, 2009)
Poland: Prison Terms for Theft of Auschwitz Sign (December 31, 2010)
The notorious sign that once spanned the main gate at Auschwitz will not return to its original spot after being repaired from the damage it suffered during a 2009 theft, an international council that oversees Auschwitz-Birkenau decided Thursday. The sign bearing the slogan “Arbeit Macht Frei,” or Work Sets You Free, will instead be housed in a planned exhibition hall, said Pawel Sawicki, a spokesman for the memorial site. Experts said the sign would be better preserved indoors. A replica of the sign now hangs in its place at the gate to the former Nazi death camp.
Related
Sign Over Auschwitz Gate Is Stolen (December 19, 2009)
Infamous Sign at Auschwitz That Was Stolen Is Found(December 21, 2009)
Poland: Prison Terms for Theft of Auschwitz Sign (December 31, 2010)
The notorious sign that once spanned the main gate at Auschwitz will not return to its original spot after being repaired from the damage it suffered during a 2009 theft, an international council that oversees Auschwitz-Birkenau decided Thursday. The sign bearing the slogan “Arbeit Macht Frei,” or Work Sets You Free, will instead be housed in a planned exhibition hall, said Pawel Sawicki, a spokesman for the memorial site. Experts said the sign would be better preserved indoors. A replica of the sign now hangs in its place at the gate to the former Nazi death camp.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)